Practice 04 / Economic & development research

Public Expenditure and Fiscal Analysis

How can public resources be allocated and used more effectively? IDER frames the study around a defined policy or programme decision, combining relevant administrative evidence with proportionate primary research. The scope establishes the population, comparison, reference period and intended users before analysis begins.

The decision challenge

How can public resources be allocated and used more effectively? A useful study distinguishes observed conditions from their possible causes and identifies the evidence needed to choose a practical response.

Questions we help you answer

  • Who benefits from public expenditure?
  • Which execution bottlenecks reduce effectiveness?
  • What are the fiscal and distributional implications of alternative options?

What the research covers

Expenditure composition and execution analysisBenefit-incidence and distributional assessmentFiscal and economic impact modellingProgramme costing and cost-effectiveness studies

How we build the evidence

  • Review administrative records, policy documents and existing evidence with clear source and period checks.
  • Design household, business or institutional surveys and qualitative consultations around the study question.
  • Apply disaggregated descriptive, economic or econometric analysis where the data and identification strategy support it.
  • Triangulate findings, test assumptions and document uncertainty and limits to causal interpretation.

Decision-ready deliverables

01

Technical report with source documentation, findings and limitations.

02

Executive brief comparing decision options and implementation implications.

03

Documented indicators and analytical tables appropriate to the scope.

04

Stakeholder presentation and an agreed dissemination or learning plan.

What this enables you to decide

Use the evidence to compare programme or policy options, identify priority groups and implementation constraints, and define measurable next steps. Recommendations distinguish what the data establish from what requires further investigation.

Quality and interpretation

Questions, analytical assumptions and source periods are defined at design stage. We triangulate administrative and primary evidence, review calculations and examine limitations, with attention to confidentiality, political neutrality and a clear separation of findings from policy judgement.

Delivery, dissemination and use

Ghana is the operational base. Other country delivery is assessed against the required scope, expert capacity and local arrangements. Findings can be shared through technical reports, executive briefs, stakeholder workshops and programme learning sessions, with participant confidentiality and agreed publication permissions.

Related research services

Evidence into action

Discuss a public expenditure and fiscal analysis assignment.

Discuss the questions, methods, expertise, timeframe and deliverables your decision needs.