Gender, Youth and Social Inclusion
Who is excluded from an opportunity, service or programme, and why? IDER frames the study around a defined policy or programme decision, combining relevant administrative evidence with proportionate primary research. The scope establishes the population, comparison, reference period and intended users before analysis begins.
The decision challenge
Who is excluded from an opportunity, service or programme, and why? A useful study distinguishes observed conditions from their possible causes and identifies the evidence needed to choose a practical response.
Questions we help you answer
- Who participates and who is left out?
- Which institutional, financial or social barriers explain exclusion?
- How should implementation change to improve access and outcomes?
What the research covers
How we build the evidence
- Review administrative records, policy documents and existing evidence with clear source and period checks.
- Design household, business or institutional surveys and qualitative consultations around the study question.
- Apply disaggregated descriptive, economic or econometric analysis where the data and identification strategy support it.
- Triangulate findings, test assumptions and document uncertainty and limits to causal interpretation.
Decision-ready deliverables
Technical report with source documentation, findings and limitations.
Executive brief comparing decision options and implementation implications.
Documented indicators and analytical tables appropriate to the scope.
Stakeholder presentation and an agreed dissemination or learning plan.
What this enables you to decide
Use the evidence to compare programme or policy options, identify priority groups and implementation constraints, and define measurable next steps. Recommendations distinguish what the data establish from what requires further investigation.
Quality and interpretation
Research design considers informed consent, privacy and the circumstances of potentially vulnerable participants. Instruments are reviewed and piloted, subgroup analysis is proportionate to sample support, and interpretation avoids treating associations or participant perceptions as established causal effects.
Delivery, dissemination and use
Ghana is the operational base. Other country delivery is assessed against the required scope, expert capacity and local arrangements. Findings can be shared through technical reports, executive briefs, stakeholder workshops and programme learning sessions, with participant confidentiality and agreed publication permissions.
Related research services
Discuss a gender, youth and social inclusion assignment.
Discuss the questions, methods, expertise, timeframe and deliverables your decision needs.